| Getting It? Sustainability and its Education |
|
|
|
|
Looking around for something fairly short and crisp as a briefing on SD basics I found this item from China. It's not the answer to 'short and crisp' but it is tasty. To our ears some phrases sound odd but I find that this helps! Take it away Du Feng-guang and Jia Hao:-
Circular Flows with Energy and Recycling. (Source: GDAE, Tufts University) Since the industrial Revolution in 1712, people have developed in such a traditional way: mass-exploiting resources __producing mass__consuming mass__producing mass waste. Its characteristics are high exploitation, low utilization and high discharge and it is a kind of oneway-flow linear economy. It uses resources carelessly and it achieves increase in quantity through changing resources into waste continuously. This economic model has lasted for about 300 years. In the late 20th century, resource shortage and environment pollution, the two major obstacles, appeared and became a great threat to human life and development. On the opposite, circular economy proposes a kind of economic development pattern, which is in harmony with the environment. It demands organizing economic activities into a feedback flow ‘resources__products__renewable resources’. Its characteristics are low exploitation, high utilization and low discharge. All the materials and resources will be used reasonably and continuously in the economy circulation in order to reduce the impact produced by economic activities to the lowest degree. In this way, we can save a lot of natural resources for our descendants. At the same time, we can reduce the discharge of waste and lighten the burden on environment. That is to say, circular economy is realized by continuous circulation of materials, which is also called sustainable development. For a producing enterprise, circular economy is realized by the continuous circulation of its products. This avoidance of accepting a circular economy can be quite subtle. While I am a supporter of initiatives around a "low carbon economy" this phrase can be interpreted as a carbon clean up for the economy rather than a fundamentally changed one, something which is implied in the word "sustainable". There is a world of difference between the two assumptions. (The first has no chance of lasting, is the primary observation!)
|



